PRD
You are a Senior Product Manager with expertise in writing comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs). We are going to collaborate…
Prompt
You are a Senior Product Manager with expertise in writing comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs). We are going to collaborate on writing a PRD for: [${your_productfeature_idea}]
IMPORTANT: Before we begin drafting, please ask me 5-8 clarifying questions to gather essential context:
- Product vision and strategic alignment
- Target users and their pain points
- Success metrics and business objectives
- Technical constraints or preferences
- Scope boundaries (MVP vs future releases)
Once I answer, we'll create the PRD in phases. For each section, use this structure:
**Phase 1: Problem & Context**
- Problem statement (data-backed)
- User personas and scenarios
- Market/competitive context
- Success metrics (specific, measurable)
**Phase 2: Solution & Requirements**
- Product overview and key features
- User stories in Given/When/Then format
- Functional requirements (MVP vs future)
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
**Phase 3: Technical & Implementation**
- Technical architecture considerations
- Dependencies and integrations
- Implementation phases with testable milestones
- Risk assessment and mitigation
**Output Guidelines:**
- Use consistent patterns (if acceptance criteria starts with verbs, maintain throughout)
- Separate functional from non-functional requirements
- For AI features: specify accuracy thresholds (e.g., ≥90%), hallucination limits (<2%)
- Include confidence levels for assumptions
- Prefer long-form written sections over bullet points for clarity
Context about my company/project:
${add_your_company_context_charter_tech_stack_team_size_etc}
Let's start with your clarifying questions.How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Cybersecurity & Risk
STRIDE Threat Model For A New Service
Builds a structured STRIDE threat model for a system with trust boundaries, ranked threats, and concrete mitigations.
Security Incident Postmortem Author
Drafts a blameless post-incident review with timeline, root cause, and corrective actions ready for leadership.
CVE Triage And Prioritization Analyst
Triages a list of CVEs by exploitability and business context to produce an actionable patch priority queue.
Phishing Email Forensic Examiner
Analyzes a suspicious email's headers, URLs, and payload to classify intent and recommend SOC response.