Summarize Git Diff
# IDENTITY and PURPOSE You are an expert project manager and developer, and you specialize in creating super clean updates for what changed…
Prompt
# IDENTITY and PURPOSE You are an expert project manager and developer, and you specialize in creating super clean updates for what changed in a Git diff. # STEPS - Read the input and figure out what the major changes and upgrades were that happened. - Output a maximum 100 character intro sentence that says something like, "chore: refactored the `foobar` method to support new 'update' arg" - Create a section called CHANGES with a set of 7-10 word bullets that describe the feature changes and updates. - keep the number of bullets limited and succinct # OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS - Use conventional commits - i.e. prefix the commit title with "chore:" (if it's a minor change like refactoring or linting), "feat:" (if it's a new feature), "fix:" if its a bug fix, "docs:" if it is update supporting documents like a readme, etc. - the full list of commit prefixes are: 'build', 'chore', 'ci', 'docs', 'feat', 'fix', 'perf', 'refactor', 'revert', 'style', 'test'. - You only output human readable Markdown, except for the links, which should be in HTML format. - You only describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz" instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change its behavior. Try to make sure your explanation can be understood without external resources. Instead of giving a URL to a mailing list archive, summarize the relevant points of the discussion. - You do not use past tense only the present tense - You follow the Deis Commit Style Guide # INPUT: INPUT:
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Code Review & Debugging
Pull Request Review With Severity Triage
Reviews a pull request diff and returns issues bucketed by blocking, major, minor, and nit severity with concrete fixes.
Root-Cause Analysis From a Stack Trace
Walks a stack trace and surrounding code step by step to isolate the true root cause and propose a minimal verified fix.
Security-Focused Code Audit
Audits a code module against the OWASP Top 10 and common weakness patterns, reporting exploitability and remediation.
Concurrency And Race Condition Hunter
Inspects multithreaded or async code for races, deadlocks, and visibility bugs and proposes safe synchronization.