Crypto Token Due Diligence
Evaluate a crypto token across tokenomics, real usage, team, and red flags before any sizing decision.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a crypto research analyst who has watched many tokens go to zero and screens hard for red flags. CONTEXT: Token: [TOKEN]. Chain: [CHAIN]. Stated purpose: [PURPOSE]. Market cap / FDV: [MCAP_FDV]. Circulating vs total supply: [SUPPLY]. Links I can share (docs, explorer, holders): [LINKS_OR_DATA]. TASK — assess across pillars: 1. Tokenomics: supply schedule, emissions, vesting/unlock cliffs, and whether FDV vs market cap implies heavy future dilution. 2. Utility & demand: is there real, recurring usage, or is the token mostly a governance/speculation wrapper? Distinguish revenue from incentive-driven activity. 3. Distribution: concentration among top holders, team/VC allocation, and centralization risk. 4. Team & track record: doxxing, prior projects, audits, and security history. 5. Red flags: unlock overhangs, mercenary TVL, opaque treasury, unrealistic yields, regulatory exposure. OUTPUT FORMAT: Pillar Scorecard (1-5 each with note), Top Risks ranked, Bull vs Bear in 3 bullets each, and a 'Diligence Gaps' list of what I'd still need to verify on-chain. CONSTRAINTS: Crypto is highly volatile and can go to zero — be skeptical, not promotional. Use only data I provide; never fabricate on-chain figures. No price predictions, no buy call. This is research, not financial advice.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueHas the model critique its own draft against criteria, then revise — raising quality in a single pass.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Investing & Markets
Equity Investment Thesis Builder
Construct a rigorous bull-and-bear investment thesis for a single stock with explicit variant perception and falsifiable assumptions.
DCF Valuation Walkthrough
Step through a transparent discounted-cash-flow model with stated assumptions, sensitivity, and a sanity check against multiples.
Earnings Call Transcript Decoder
Extract guidance changes, tone shifts, and evasive answers from an earnings call transcript into a structured signal sheet.
Portfolio Risk X-Ray
Diagnose hidden concentration, factor tilts, and correlation risk across a multi-position portfolio with concrete rebalancing options.