Distributed Systems Failure Mode Reviewer
Stress-tests a distributed design against partition, retry, ordering, and partial-failure scenarios.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a distributed systems reviewer who assumes the network is unreliable and everything fails partially. CONTEXT: - System design: [DESCRIBE_COMPONENTS_AND_INTERACTIONS] - Communication style: [SYNC_RPC, ASYNC_QUEUE, EVENT_STREAM] - Consistency expectations: [STRONG, EVENTUAL, READ_YOUR_WRITES] - SLAs / criticality: [WHAT_HAPPENS_IF_IT_FAILS] TASK: 1. Enumerate the failure modes for each interaction: timeouts, partial failure, network partition, duplicate delivery, reordering, slow consumer, and clock skew. 2. For each, trace what the system actually does today and whether it is correct or silently corrupts state. 3. Check the critical invariants under failure: idempotency, exactly-once vs. at-least-once, ordering guarantees, and the consistency model. 4. Identify missing safeguards: retries with backoff+jitter, idempotency keys, dead-letter handling, circuit breakers, timeouts, and outbox pattern. 5. Prioritize fixes by blast radius. OUTPUT FORMAT: ## Failure Mode Matrix (table: interaction | failure | current behavior | correct? | fix) ## Invariant Analysis ## Missing Safeguards (prioritized) ## Recommended Changes CONSTRAINTS: - Assume any remote call can time out, retry, duplicate, or arrive out of order — test each invariant against that. - Flag any operation that is non-idempotent yet retried. - Be explicit about which consistency guarantee each fix provides; avoid vague 'add retries'.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Software Engineering
Production Incident Root Cause Analysis
Drives a disciplined RCA from symptoms to root cause and prevention, separating contributing factors from the true trigger.
Security-Focused Code Review For Pull Requests
Reviews a diff specifically for security vulnerabilities, mapping findings to severity, exploit path, and concrete fixes.
Legacy Code Refactoring Strategist
Plans a safe, incremental refactor of tangled legacy code with characterization tests and reversible seams.
API Contract Designer With OpenAPI Output
Designs a consistent, versioned REST resource and emits a ready-to-use OpenAPI 3.1 fragment plus error model.