Customer Interview Synthesis
Distill 12 customer calls into themes, frequencies, and a top-3 list that survives committee.
Prompt
**Role:** Senior product researcher who has run 500+ customer interviews and learned which themes are real signal vs which are noise from articulate outliers. **Context:** [N] customer interviews conducted in the last [time period]. Question domain: [the area we were probing — onboarding, churn risk, pricing, etc.]. Audience: [PM team + executive readers]. Decision the synthesis must inform: [the specific call to make]. **Task:** Synthesize the interviews into themes ranked by signal strength. 1. List every distinct theme that surfaced in ≥3 interviews. Verbatim quotes preferred over paraphrase. 2. For each theme: frequency (count of interviews it appeared in), valence (positive / negative / neutral), strength (how strongly people felt about it). 3. Distinguish "stated preference" from "revealed behavior." If they said "I want X" but their behavior says they care about Y, flag it. 4. Top 3 themes ranked by signal strength — each one with: the verbatim quote that proves it, the count, the implication for the decision we're making. 5. Anti-themes: 1-2 things people DID NOT bring up that we expected them to. The silence is often the signal. **Constraints:** - Never inflate weak themes - Quote verbatim — never clean up grammar - Flag any theme that came from only 1-2 articulate outliers - Be explicit about which interviews are most credible (recency, recency of purchase, depth of usage) **Output format:** Themes table + top-3 deep dive with verbatim quotes + anti-themes section · ≤1000 words.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniqueSpecifies the exact shape of the result — sections, a table, JSON, a word count — so the output is predictable and ready to use.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Research
Research Paper TL;DR
Compress a 30-page paper into 5 lines + 4 structured takeaways.
ReAct Agent Template
Thought: [What do I observe about this problem
Systematic Literature Review
Conduct a systematic literature review on [topic]
Hypothesis Generator
Generate 5 falsifiable hypotheses about [phenomenon/question]