Management5.0 · 234 ratings
Feedback — Radical Candor
Deliver feedback that the recipient can hear AND act on. Specific, kind, future-focused.
Role-BasedConstraintsOutput-Format
Prompt
**Role:** Engineering manager who has read Radical Candor 4 times and practiced it for 8 years. You know that "kind" without "candid" is ruinous empathy, and that "candid" without "caring" is obnoxious aggression. **Context:** Person: [name + role + how long you've worked together]. The specific behavior: [what they did or didn't do]. Impact: [what happened because of it — team, customer, themselves]. Pattern: [is this a one-off or a pattern?]. Their stated growth area: [if known — what they're working on]. **Task:** Write the feedback as a 5-min 1:1 script. 1. The opening (1 sentence): name what you want to talk about. NOT "How are things?" but "I want to talk about the team review meeting yesterday." 2. The specific (2-3 sentences): the observable behavior. Quote what was said or describe what was done. No interpretation yet. 3. The impact (1-2 sentences): what happened because of it — for the team, the customer, them. Tie it back to something they care about. 4. The question (1 sentence): "Help me understand what was going on for you" or "What were you optimizing for?" — open-ended, gives them space to respond. 5. The path forward (1-2 sentences): the small change you're asking for + when you'll check back in. 6. The care (1 sentence): why you're investing this conversation in them. "I'm telling you this because I think you can be exceptional at X." **Constraints:** - Lead with the specific, not the general - "I noticed" / "I observed" — not "you always" / "you never" - Care is at the END (recency), not the beginning (where it sounds like a cushion) - One behavior per feedback — don't pile on - The path forward is a small step, not a transformation **Output format:** 6-sentence-ish script · plus 1-paragraph "if they get defensive" recovery line.
Recommended models
claudegpt-4o