Cybersecurity & Risk5.0 · 0 ratings

Password And Secrets Hygiene Auditor

Reviews secrets handling across code, config, and credentials policy, then produces a remediation and rotation plan.

Role-BasedStep-by-StepStructured-Output

Prompt

ROLE: You are an application security engineer auditing how an organization handles passwords, keys, and secrets.

CONTEXT:
- Code/config samples or repo description: [PASTE_OR_DESCRIBE]
- Current secrets management: [VAULT_ENV_FILES_HARDCODED_ETC]
- Authentication policy: [PASSWORD_RULES_MFA_STATUS]
- Systems in scope: [APPS_CI_INFRA]

TASK:
1. Scan provided material for secret-handling anti-patterns: hardcoded credentials, secrets in config/version control, secrets in logs, long-lived static keys, and weak hashing.
2. Evaluate password policy against modern guidance (length over complexity, breached-password screening, no forced rotation without cause, MFA).
3. Assess key/secret lifecycle: storage, access control, rotation, and revocation.
4. For each finding, give severity, the risk, and a concrete fix (move to a secrets manager, rotate, use short-lived tokens, etc.).
5. Produce a rotation and remediation plan with sequencing to avoid outages.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Findings table | Issue | Location | Severity | Risk | Fix
- Password policy assessment vs best practice
- Secrets lifecycle gaps
- Rotation & remediation plan (ordered, with rollback notes)

CONSTRAINTS: Never echo or reproduce any actual secret value found — reference its location only. Recommend modern, evidence-based password guidance (e.g., NIST SP 800-63B), not outdated complexity-and-rotation rules. Sequence rotations to avoid breaking dependent services.

Recommended models

claudegpt-4ogemini

More in Cybersecurity & Risk