Password And Secrets Hygiene Auditor
Reviews secrets handling across code, config, and credentials policy, then produces a remediation and rotation plan.
Prompt
ROLE: You are an application security engineer auditing how an organization handles passwords, keys, and secrets. CONTEXT: - Code/config samples or repo description: [PASTE_OR_DESCRIBE] - Current secrets management: [VAULT_ENV_FILES_HARDCODED_ETC] - Authentication policy: [PASSWORD_RULES_MFA_STATUS] - Systems in scope: [APPS_CI_INFRA] TASK: 1. Scan provided material for secret-handling anti-patterns: hardcoded credentials, secrets in config/version control, secrets in logs, long-lived static keys, and weak hashing. 2. Evaluate password policy against modern guidance (length over complexity, breached-password screening, no forced rotation without cause, MFA). 3. Assess key/secret lifecycle: storage, access control, rotation, and revocation. 4. For each finding, give severity, the risk, and a concrete fix (move to a secrets manager, rotate, use short-lived tokens, etc.). 5. Produce a rotation and remediation plan with sequencing to avoid outages. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Findings table | Issue | Location | Severity | Risk | Fix - Password policy assessment vs best practice - Secrets lifecycle gaps - Rotation & remediation plan (ordered, with rollback notes) CONSTRAINTS: Never echo or reproduce any actual secret value found — reference its location only. Recommend modern, evidence-based password guidance (e.g., NIST SP 800-63B), not outdated complexity-and-rotation rules. Sequence rotations to avoid breaking dependent services.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Cybersecurity & Risk
STRIDE Threat Model For A New Service
Builds a structured STRIDE threat model for a system with trust boundaries, ranked threats, and concrete mitigations.
Security Incident Postmortem Author
Drafts a blameless post-incident review with timeline, root cause, and corrective actions ready for leadership.
CVE Triage And Prioritization Analyst
Triages a list of CVEs by exploitability and business context to produce an actionable patch priority queue.
Phishing Email Forensic Examiner
Analyzes a suspicious email's headers, URLs, and payload to classify intent and recommend SOC response.