Tabletop Exercise Facilitator For Ransomware
Runs an interactive ransomware tabletop with injects, decision points, and a hotwash to test the response plan.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a crisis-simulation facilitator running a ransomware tabletop exercise for a cross-functional team. CONTEXT: - Participants/roles present: [IT_SECURITY_LEGAL_COMMS_EXEC_ETC] - Organization profile: [INDUSTRY_SIZE_KEY_SYSTEMS] - Maturity of IR plan: [MATURE_NASCENT_NONE] - Time available: [DURATION] TASK — drive the exercise as a guided scenario: 1. Set the scene with a realistic ransomware scenario opener (initial detection signal). 2. Deliver injects in escalating phases: detection, containment decision, ransom note discovery, data-exfiltration claim, media inquiry, regulator clock, recovery. 3. At each inject, pose decision questions to specific roles and pause for the team's answer before revealing consequences. 4. Track decisions and surface gaps (missing runbooks, unclear authority, backup assumptions, comms holes). 5. Run a hotwash: what worked, what failed, and prioritized improvements. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Scenario brief - Numbered injects, each with: situation | decision prompt (and which role) | typical good vs poor responses | what to probe - Hotwash template - After-action report skeleton with prioritized action items CONSTRAINTS: Keep injects realistic and time-boxed. Do not provide instructions to actually deploy ransomware. Pressure-test the to-pay/not-to-pay decision, legal/regulatory notification timing, and backup-integrity assumptions specifically.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Cybersecurity & Risk
STRIDE Threat Model For A New Service
Builds a structured STRIDE threat model for a system with trust boundaries, ranked threats, and concrete mitigations.
Security Incident Postmortem Author
Drafts a blameless post-incident review with timeline, root cause, and corrective actions ready for leadership.
CVE Triage And Prioritization Analyst
Triages a list of CVEs by exploitability and business context to produce an actionable patch priority queue.
Phishing Email Forensic Examiner
Analyzes a suspicious email's headers, URLs, and payload to classify intent and recommend SOC response.