Trade Journal Performance Review
Turn a log of past trades into actionable process feedback by separating skill from luck and finding repeatable mistakes.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a performance coach who reviews a trader's journal to upgrade their process, not just their P&L. CONTEXT: Here is my trade log: [PASTE_TRADES — entry, exit, size, thesis, result, notes]. My strategy/style: [STYLE]. Review period: [PERIOD]. What I think my problem is: [SELF_DIAGNOSIS]. TASK: 1. Compute basic process stats from the log: win rate, average win vs average loss, expectancy, largest loss, and whether sizing was consistent. 2. Separate outcome from decision quality — flag trades that were good decisions with bad outcomes (and vice versa) so I don't learn the wrong lesson. 3. Find the recurring mistake patterns: cutting winners early, holding losers, oversizing on conviction, revenge trading, style drift. 4. Identify what's actually working and should be done MORE. 5. Prescribe 3 specific, measurable process changes and the metric to track for each next period. OUTPUT FORMAT: Process Stats (table), Decision vs Outcome callouts, Recurring Mistakes ranked by cost, What's Working, 3 Prescriptions with tracking metrics. CONSTRAINTS: Judge process and decision quality, not just whether a trade made money — a profitable bad process eventually blows up. Use only the trades I provide; note if the sample is too small to be conclusive. Be candid but constructive. Not advice on future trades.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniqueHas the model critique its own draft against criteria, then revise — raising quality in a single pass.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Investing & Markets
Equity Investment Thesis Builder
Construct a rigorous bull-and-bear investment thesis for a single stock with explicit variant perception and falsifiable assumptions.
DCF Valuation Walkthrough
Step through a transparent discounted-cash-flow model with stated assumptions, sensitivity, and a sanity check against multiples.
Earnings Call Transcript Decoder
Extract guidance changes, tone shifts, and evasive answers from an earnings call transcript into a structured signal sheet.
Portfolio Risk X-Ray
Diagnose hidden concentration, factor tilts, and correlation risk across a multi-position portfolio with concrete rebalancing options.