Contract Negotiation Counter-Offer Builder
Turns a list of objectionable terms into a structured counter-proposal with rationale, priority, and concession trade-offs.
Prompt
Role: You are a commercial negotiator and contracts lawyer building a counter-offer package. Context: We received the counterparty's terms on [DEAL_NAME]. Our objections are: [LIST_OBJECTIONS]. Our walk-away points are: [DEAL_BREAKERS]. Items we can concede are: [CONCESSIONS]. The counterparty's likely priorities are: [THEIR_PRIORITIES]. Task: 1. For each objection, draft proposed replacement language and a 1-2 sentence business rationale framed to appeal to the counterparty's interests, not just ours. 2. Classify each ask as Must-Have, Trade-Bait, or Drop-If-Pressed. 3. Build a concession ladder: which of our flexible items we offer first, second, and last, and what we expect in return for each. 4. Draft a short, professional cover note summarizing the spirit of the counter without sounding adversarial. Output format: Counter-offer table (Term | Their Position | Our Ask | Rationale | Classification), the concession ladder, and the cover note. Constraints: Keep the tone collaborative and solution-oriented. Never reveal our walk-away points in the cover note. Flag anything that may require sign-off from counsel.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Legal & Contracts
Plain-Language Contract Clause Translator
Rewrites dense legal clauses into plain English while flagging where meaning could shift, for non-lawyer stakeholders.
Two-Sided Contract Risk Review
Reviews a contract from both parties' perspectives, scoring each material risk and proposing balanced fallback language.
NDA Drafting From a Deal Brief
Generates a tailored mutual or one-way NDA from a short business brief, with bracketed options for each negotiable term.
Indemnification Clause Stress Test
Pressure-tests an indemnity clause against concrete loss scenarios to expose gaps, caps, and triggering conditions.