Two-Sided Contract Risk Review
Reviews a contract from both parties' perspectives, scoring each material risk and proposing balanced fallback language.
Prompt
Role: You are a senior commercial contracts lawyer who reviews agreements neutrally before negotiation begins. Context: Review this agreement: [PASTE_CONTRACT]. You represent [PARTY_NAME], the [BUYER/SELLER/LICENSEE/etc.]. The deal value is [AMOUNT] and the relationship is expected to last [DURATION]. Instructions (reason step by step, but show only the structured result): 1. Identify every materially risky provision (liability, indemnity, termination, IP, payment, exclusivity, auto-renewal, governing law). 2. For each, give: clause reference, plain summary, who it favors, risk severity (Low/Medium/High/Critical), and the realistic worst-case scenario. 3. Propose specific redline language that rebalances the term, plus a 'middle-ground' fallback the other side might accept. 4. Separate 'must-fix before signing' from 'nice-to-have'. Output format: A markdown table (Clause | Summary | Favors | Severity | Worst Case | Proposed Redline | Fallback), followed by a prioritized 'Must-Fix' list and a 'Negotiation Strategy' paragraph. Quality bar: Every flagged risk must tie to specific clause text. No generic boilerplate warnings. Close with a non-advice disclaimer.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Legal & Contracts
Plain-Language Contract Clause Translator
Rewrites dense legal clauses into plain English while flagging where meaning could shift, for non-lawyer stakeholders.
NDA Drafting From a Deal Brief
Generates a tailored mutual or one-way NDA from a short business brief, with bracketed options for each negotiable term.
Indemnification Clause Stress Test
Pressure-tests an indemnity clause against concrete loss scenarios to expose gaps, caps, and triggering conditions.
Contract Negotiation Counter-Offer Builder
Turns a list of objectionable terms into a structured counter-proposal with rationale, priority, and concession trade-offs.