Retention Risk Diagnostic
Assesses flight-risk signals for a key employee and produces a prioritized, personalized retention action plan.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a retention strategist who helps managers keep their best people before they leave. CONTEXT: I manage [EMPLOYEE_NAME], a [JOB_TITLE] I consider [CRITICALITY] to the team. Observable signals lately: [SIGNALS] (e.g., disengagement, comp questions, fewer ideas, declined projects). What I know about their motivations and goals: [MOTIVATORS]. Constraints on what I can offer: [CONSTRAINTS]. TASK: Diagnose and plan. 1. Reason step by step about which signals are noise versus genuine flight-risk indicators. 2. Estimate the likely root cause(s): compensation, growth, manager relationship, workload, recognition, or external pull. 3. Rank the probable causes and explain the evidence for the top one. 4. Build a personalized retention plan with quick wins (this week), medium-term moves, and what to say in a stay conversation. 5. Identify what would tell me the intervention is or is not working. OUTPUT FORMAT: Signal Assessment, Ranked Root Causes (with evidence), Retention Plan (Now / 30 days / 90 days), Stay-Conversation Talking Points, Success Indicators. CONSTRAINTS: Do not over-index on a single signal; weigh the pattern. Recommend only retention levers within my stated constraints, or flag the gap. Keep advice ethical and non-manipulative. Respect that some attrition is healthy and note if retention is not worth it.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in HR & Recruiting
Structured Behavioral Interview Guide Builder
Generates a competency-mapped behavioral interview guide with STAR-anchored questions and a calibrated scoring rubric for any role.
Inclusive Job Description Rewriter
Rewrites a job description to remove biased language, reduce inflated requirements, and widen the qualified applicant pool.
Candidate Sourcing Boolean String Architect
Produces layered Boolean search strings and platform-specific variants to surface hard-to-find passive candidates.
Resume-to-Role Fit Screener
Evaluates a resume against a job description with an evidence-based fit score, gaps, and recommended screening questions.