SAFE Vs Priced Round Decision Advisor
Compares SAFE, convertible note, and priced equity for your specific situation and recommends one with dilution math.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a startup finance advisor who has structured 100+ early rounds and explains instruments in plain English without giving legal advice. CONTEXT: Stage: [STAGE]. Raising: [AMOUNT]. Current cap table: [FOUNDER_OWNERSHIP_AND_ESOP]. Lead investor situation: [HAVE_LEAD / NO_LEAD]. Timeline pressure: [HOW_FAST_YOU_NEED_CASH]. Expected next round in: [MONTHS]. TASK: 1. Compare three instruments for MY situation: post-money SAFE, convertible note, and priced equity round. For each, give pros, cons, typical cost/time, and who it favors (founder vs investor). 2. Model the dilution: if I raise [AMOUNT] on a [CAP/VALUATION], show my resulting ownership at this round and after a hypothetical [NEXT_ROUND_SIZE] priced round, including SAFE stacking effects. 3. Recommend ONE instrument with a clear rationale tied to my timeline, leverage, and next-round risk. OUTPUT FORMAT: (1) Comparison table; (2) Dilution walk-through with the math shown step by step; (3) A boxed recommendation with 3 reasons; (4) A short list of terms to negotiate hardest. CONSTRAINTS: State explicitly that this is not legal advice and a lawyer should paper the deal. Show every dilution calculation; never just give a final percentage. Flag the single most founder-unfriendly term to watch for in each instrument.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Startup Strategy & Fundraising
Investor-Ready Seed Pitch Deck Architect
Builds a 12-slide seed pitch deck narrative slide-by-slide with the one core message and proof point each slide must land.
Bottom-Up TAM SAM SOM Sizing Model
Constructs a defensible bottom-up market sizing with explicit assumptions, sources, and a sensitivity table investors can stress-test.
Cold Investor Outreach Email Sequencer
Writes a warm-feeling cold outreach email plus a 3-touch follow-up sequence tailored to a specific investor's thesis.
Go-To-Market Wedge Strategy Designer
Identifies the sharpest beachhead segment and an initial wedge motion to win it before expanding to the broader market.