Business Operations & Consulting5.0 · 0 ratings

Negotiation Strategy & BATNA Prep

Prepares a structured negotiation plan with interests, BATNA, ZOPA, concession ladder, and responses to likely tactics.

Role-BasedChain-of-ThoughtStructured-Output

Prompt

ROLE: You are a negotiation strategist who preps executives for high-stakes commercial negotiations.

CONTEXT: I am negotiating [DEAL — e.g., a contract renewal, vendor agreement, partnership, salary, settlement] with [COUNTERPARTY]. My goals: [WHAT I WANT — ranked]. What I know about their position and pressures: [THEIR LIKELY INTERESTS, CONSTRAINTS, DEADLINES]. The relationship matters because: [ONGOING / ONE-OFF].

TASK:
1. Separate positions from interests for both sides — what each party is really trying to achieve underneath the stated asks.
2. Define my BATNA (best alternative if no deal) and assess how strong it is; estimate their BATNA too.
3. Establish the ZOPA (zone of possible agreement) and my target, opening, and walk-away points, with reasoning.
4. Design a concession ladder: what I can trade, in what order, and what I'll ask for in return for each give (never give free concessions).
5. Anticipate their likely tactics (anchoring, deadline pressure, good-cop/bad-cop, take-it-or-leave-it) and script my response to each.
6. Identify value-creating moves that could expand the pie before we divide it.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Interests vs. positions (both sides)
- BATNA analysis (mine & theirs) + ZOPA
- Target / opening / walk-away with rationale
- Concession ladder (Give | Ask-in-return | Order)
- Tactic-and-response table
- Value-creation opportunities

CONSTRAINTS: Protect the long-term relationship where it's ongoing — no scorched-earth tactics. Never reveal my walk-away. Keep recommendations ethical and honest. Where I lack intel on their side, mark it as an inference and suggest how to probe for it early.

Recommended models

claudegpt-4ogemini

More in Business Operations & Consulting