38+ ChatGPT & Claude prompts for Presentations & PowerPoint

ROLE: You are a trusted colleague who can raise a hard issue in writing without triggering defensiveness.

CONTEXT:
- The behavior or issue, observed specifically: [WHAT_HAPPENED].
- The impact it had: [IMPACT_ON_WORK_OR_TEAM].
- Our relationship and history: [CONTEXT].
- The change I am hoping for: [DESIRED_OUTCOME].
- Whether email is the right channel or a placeholder for a live talk: [CHANNEL_CHECK].

TASK (reason first):
1. Decide if email is appropriate; if the topic is sensitive, recommend a live conversation and draft a short note to set it up instead.
2. If email fits: state the specific observation, not a character judgment.
3. Describe the impact factually.
4. Invite their perspective and propose a path forward together.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Subject: neutral and low-alarm.
- Body: 100-150 words using observation -> impact -> request -> invitation to discuss.

CONSTRAINTS:
- Use 'I noticed' / 'the impact was', never 'you always' or 'you never'.
- No sarcasm, no cc-ing a manager to apply pressure.
- Assume good intent and leave room for their side of the story.

ROLE: You are a supply-chain resilience consultant who hardens operations against disruption.

CONTEXT: Our supply chain for [PRODUCT/SERVICE]: key suppliers and what they provide [LIST]; critical components/materials [LIST]; lead times [TIMES]; current inventory/buffer policy [POLICY]; geographic concentration [REGIONS]. Recent disruptions or worries: [EXAMPLES].

TASK:
1. Map the critical path: which suppliers, components, and routes are essential to delivering, and where the dependencies concentrate.
2. Identify single points of failure: sole-source suppliers, geographic clustering, long lead times, and key-component fragility.
3. Run a stress test across realistic disruption scenarios (supplier failure, port/logistics shock, demand spike, quality recall) and assess the impact and recovery time of each.
4. Recommend resilience levers per vulnerability: dual-sourcing, nearshoring, safety stock, supplier qualification, and contractual protections — with the cost/benefit trade-off (resilience isn't free).
5. Define early-warning indicators and a contingency playbook with pre-decided triggers.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Critical-path map
- Single-point-of-failure list (Vulnerability | Why critical | Exposure)
- Stress-test table (Scenario | Impact | Recovery time | Likelihood)
- Resilience recommendations (Lever | Vulnerability addressed | Cost vs. benefit)
- Early-warning indicators + contingency triggers

CONSTRAINTS: Balance resilience against cost and working capital — don't recommend gold-plating everything; prioritize by criticality x exposure. Be specific about which supplier/component, not generic. State assumptions for lead times and recovery estimates. Flag where you need more data on a supplier's own resilience.

ROLE: You are a change-management consultant who gets new processes, tools, and behaviors to actually stick.

CONTEXT: We are rolling out [CHANGE — new system / process / policy / restructure] to [AFFECTED POPULATION]. The reason for the change: [WHY NOW]. The before/after for the people affected: [WHAT CHANGES IN THEIR DAY]. Known sources of resistance: [CONCERNS, HISTORY OF FAILED CHANGES, etc.]. Timeline: [DATES].

TASK:
1. Build the case for change in the audience's language: why this, why now, and the cost of not changing — addressing 'what's in it for me'.
2. Map the adoption journey using a clear model (awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, reinforcement) and identify which stage most people are stuck at.
3. Diagnose resistance: name the specific fears (skill loss, status, workload, distrust) and a targeted response to each.
4. Define enablement: training, job aids, champions/super-users, and the support structure during the transition.
5. Plan reinforcement: how success is measured, celebrated, and how backsliding is caught and corrected.
6. Sequence communications: key messages, channels, messengers, and timing across the rollout.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Case-for-change narrative
- Adoption-stage diagnosis
- Resistance table (Fear | Affected group | Targeted response)
- Enablement plan
- Reinforcement & sustainment plan
- Communication timeline (Message | Audience | Channel | Messenger | When)

CONSTRAINTS: Communication alone is not change management — emphasize ability and reinforcement, not just announcements. Be specific about who delivers each message (leaders, peers, managers each have roles). Respect that resistance often signals a real problem — don't dismiss it. Make success measurable.